블로그 홈 |  기자 블로그 |  새로운 글 |  Blog뉴스 |  카페  |  사진마을 블로그 개설 |  랜덤 블로그
lilsea
blog.chosun.com/lilsea
 
작은바다 (lilsea)
60년대말 펄펄 날던때... 그땐 큰 바다를 그렸었지... 70년 함포(53포) 앞에서.
전체게시물 (33)
도민증  
단위의 표기  
국가 코드  
수사.명수법  
날자와 시간의 표기  
서울의 한자표기  
한글의 로마자 표기  
별의 종류  
생각한 글  
빌려온 글  
옮겨온 글  
노래 듣기  
사진 올리기  
뉴스 엮인글  
뉴스 스크랩  
 
Today  4    / Total  23293
  
빌려온 글    블로그형  게시판형  리스트형
Names for Large Numbers    2008/02/26 19:02 추천 0    스크랩 0
http://blog.chosun.com/lilsea/2824757
 

Names for Large Numbers

The English names for large numbers are coined from the Latin names for small numbers n by adding the ending -illion suggested by the name "million." Thus billion and trillion are coined from the Latin prefixes bi- (n = 2) and tri- (n = 3), respectively. In the American system for naming large numbers, the name coined from the Latin number n applies to the number 103n+3. In a system traditional in many European countries, the same name applies to the number 106n.

In particular, a billion is 109 = 1 000 000 000 in the American system and 1012 = 1 000 000 000 000 in the European system. For 109, Europeans say "thousand million" or "milliard."

Although we describe the two systems today as American or European, both systems are actually of French origin. The French physician and mathematician Nicolas Chuquet (1445-1488) apparently coined the words byllion and tryllion and used them to represent 1012 and 1018, respectively, thus establishing what we now think of as the "European" system. However, it was also French mathematicians of the 1600's who used billion and trillion for 109 and 1012, respectively. This usage became common in France and in America, while the original Chuquet nomenclature remained in use in Britain and Germany. The French decided in 1948 to revert to the Chuquet ("European") system, leaving the U.S. as the chief standard bearer for what then became clearly an American system.

In recent years, American usage has eroded the European system, particularly in Britain and to a lesser extent in other countries. This is primarily due to American finance, because Americans insist that $1 000 000 000 be called a billion dollars. In 1974, the government of Prime Minister Harold Wilson announced that henceforth "billion" would mean 109 and not 1012 in official British reports and statistics. The Times of London style guide now defines "billion" as "one thousand million, not a million million."

The result of all this is widespread confusion. Anyone who uses the words "billion" and "trillion" internationally should make clear which meaning of those words is intended. On the Internet, some sites outside the U.S. use the compound designation "milliard/billion" to designate the number 1 000 000 000. In science, the names of large numbers are usually avoided completely by using the appropriate SI prefixes. Thus 109 watts is a gigawatt and 1012 joules is a terajoule. Such terms cannot be mistaken.

There is no real hope of resolving the controversy in favor of either system. Americans are not likely to adopt the European nomenclature, and Europeans will always regard the American system as an imposition. However, it is possible to imagine a solution: junk both Latin-based systems and move to a Greek-based system in which, for n >3, the Greek number n is used to generate a name for 103n. (The traditional names thousand and million are retained for n = 1 and 2 and the special name gillion, suggested by the SI prefix giga-, is proposed for n = 3.)

n =

103n =

American
name 

European
name

SI prefix

Greek-based
name
(proposed) 

3

109

billion

milliard

giga-

gillion

4

1012

trillion

billion

tera-

tetrillion

5

1015

quadrillion

billiard

peta-

pentillion

6

1018

quintillion

trillion

exa-

hexillion

7

1021

sextillion

trilliard

zetta-

heptillion

8

1024

septillion

quadrillion

yotta-

oktillion

9

1027

octillion

quadrilliard

 

ennillion

10

1030

nonillion

quintillion

 

dekillion

11

1033

decillion

quintilliard

 

hendekillion

12

1036

undecillion

sextillion

 

dodekillion

13

1039

duodecillion

sextilliard

 

trisdekillion

14

1042

tredecillion

septillion

 

tetradekillion

15

1045

quattuordecillion

septilliard

 

pentadekillion

16

1048

quindecillion

octillion

 

hexadekillion

17

1051

sexdecillion

octilliard

 

heptadekillion

18

1054

septendecillion

nonillion

 

oktadekillion

19

1057

octodecillion

nonilliard

 

enneadekillion

20

1060

novemdecillion

decillion

 

icosillion

21

1063

vigintillion

decilliard

 

icosihenillion

22

1066

unvigintillion

undecillion

 

icosidillion

23

1069

duovigintillion

undecilliard

 

icositrillion

24

1072

trevigintillion

duodecillion

 

icositetrillion

25

1075

quattuorvigintillion

duodecilliard

 

icosipentillion

26

1078

quinvigintillion

tredecillion

 

icosihexillion

27

1081

sexvigintillion

tredecilliard

 

icosiheptillion

28

1084

septenvigintillion

quattuordecillion

 

icosioktillion

29

1087

octovigintillion

quattuordecilliard

 

icosiennillion

30

1090

novemvigintillion

quindecillion

 

triacontillion

31

1093

trigintillion

quindecilliard

 

triacontahenillion

32

1096

untrigintillion

sexdecillion

 

triacontadillion

33

1099

duotrigintillion

sexdecilliard

 

triacontatrillion

 

This process can be continued indefinitely, but one has to stop somewhere. The name centillion (n = 100) has appeared in many dictionaries. A centillion is 10303 (1 followed by 303 zeroes) in the American system and a whopping 10600 (1 followed by 600 zeroes) in the European system.

Finally, there is the googol, the number 10100 (1 followed by 100 zeroes). Invented more for fun than for use, the googol lies outside the regular naming systems. The googol equals 10 duotrigintillion in the American system, 10 sexdecilliard in the European system, and 10 triacontatrillion in the proposed Greek-based system.

The googolplex (1 followed by a googol of zeroes) is far larger than any of the numbers discu



  댓글 (0)  |  엮인글 (0)
  이전       1     2     3     4     5     6     7       다음